Giro Cylinder Shoes Review

About Giro Cylinder Cycling Shoes 

Released in 2017, Giro’s Cylinder bicycle shoes feature a single BOA® L6 dial that allows for 1mm adjustments when tightening, along with a macro-release function that immediately loosens and enables you to remove your feet. Below, there’s a forefoot Velcro strap for set-it-and-forget-it convenience. 

Other features found in the Cylinder shoes include an injected nylon plate for efficient power transfer, a co-molded rubber and lugged outsole for high traction and durability, a mid-foot scuff guard, toe and heel microfiber reinforcements, and die-cut EVA insole footbeds with medium arch support.  

Giro’s Cylinders are compatible with two-bolt pedal and cleat systems, including Shimano SPD, Time ATAC, and Crank Brothers, and are geared toward cyclocross and MTB riders. In addition to the standard option, these shoes are also available in an HV version for riders with wide or high-volume feet and a women’s model (no discernable difference, other than color scheme).

My Experience with Giro’s Cylinder Bike Shoes 

After thoroughly putting two pairs of Giro’s Privateer MTB shoes (you can skip to the next section for a comparison) through the wringer and then riding thousands of miles with the Giro Cinder MIPS helmet, I’ve found that the company’s reputation for quality and durability is well-earned. 

Giro Cylinder Adaptability & Sizing 

When it comes to bike shoes, I’m a single-pair person. I’ve found that Giro’s Privateers adeptly handled everything from road and gravel, to singletrack and hike-a-bike. As such, when it was time to upgrade, I decided to stick with the brand and ordered a pair of blue Cylinders from BikeShoes.com.

Pro Tip: In my experience, Giro’s bike shoes run a little small, so I always buy a pair that’s one-half size larger than usual.

Giro Cylinder Adjustability & Comfort 

I loved my Privateer’s three Velcro straps, so I was initially nervous about the Cylinder’s BOA ratchet system. After several hundred miles, though, I can say I thoroughly enjoy the BOA’s minute adjustments, which also remain in place better than the Privateer’s staps, since they flex and stretch as I ride. 

With this said, I appreciate that Giro included a lower Velcro strap on the Cylinders for macro adjustments. In most instances, I set the strap once and don’t touch it again until I’m back on the saddle. 

Other than the BOA strap, though, I don’t feel like I’m wearing a different pair of shoes between the Privateers and Cylinders. I’ll say that the Cylinder’s front-toe section feels less dense than on my Privateers, but I haven’t had any sensitivity issues during rock strikes.

Giro Cylinder Air Flow & Stiffness 

Along these same lines, the mesh behind/atop the Cylinder’s toe area noticeably improves circulation over the Privateers, but doesn’t seem to allow greater water penetration, even though I’ve taken more than one unplanned mid-stream misstep. They are not, however, waterproof.

I don’t have arch issues, but the Cylinder’s sole offers plenty of stiffness for pedaling efficiency while offering some flex when off the bike. The rubber sole also delivers excellent traction in most circumstances, although I’m anxious to see if they wear similarly to my Privateers.

Adding Toe Spikes to Your Giro Cylinders 

As with the Privateers, the Cylinder’s toe screws wear quickly, which I typically exacerbate with a healthy amount of hike-a-biking. I ordered Giro’s toe spike kit to replace the screws, and—despite the steep price—I can unequivocally tell you they’re amazing, and deliver better traction and stability off the bike, whether on pavement, gravel, dirt, or mud.

Note: Just be careful not to damage any surfaces in your house before heading out the door!

Giro’s toe spikes also offer additional catch-points if your cleat doesn’t immediately align with your pedal. 

The Bottom Line About Giro’s Cylinder Cycling Shoes 

Like the Privateers, my Giro Cylinders have proven to deliver a ton of value, excellent comfort, and superb adaptability. They also improve airflow over the Privateers, and the micro-adjustments available with the BOA L6 dial allow for greater customization when it comes to fit.

If you do much hike-a-biking, I’ve found Giro’s toe spikes are an expensive—but necessary—upgrade, considering what you actually get for the money. However, they make an already stellar pair of cycling shoes even better. Highly recommended. 

Giro Cylinder vs. Privateer, Terraduro, & Savix Cycling Shoes 

Let’s take a high-level look at how the Cylinder stacks up against other popular models in the Giro lineup: 

Model	Type	Weight	Closures	Notes
Giro Cylinder	MTB (General)	315g (size 42)	1 BOA ® L6, 1 Velcro toe strap	Synthetic upper, die-cut footbeds, nylon and rubber lugged co-molded outsole, toe and heel microfiber reinforcements
Giro Privateer	MTB (General)	375g (size 42.5)	N-1 micro-ratcheting buckle, 2 Velcro straps	Welded and stitched upper, nylon and rubber lugged co-molded outsole, EVA footbed, rubber toe-guard
Giro Terraduro	MTB (Enduro, All-Mountain)	420g (size 42.5)	N-1 micro-ratcheting buckle, 2 Velcro straps	EVO fiber microfiber upper, rubber toe cap, molded EVA footbed, Vibram high-traction lugged outsole, flexible forefoot walking zone
Giro Savix	Road	310g (size 42)	1 BOA ® L6, 1 Velcro toe strap	Microfiber upper, die-cut insoles, injected nylon outsole, 2-or-3-bolt cleat mount
Giro Sector	MTB (General)	342g (size 42)	2 BOA ® L6 (steel and soft lace guides)	SynchWire one-piece upper, reinforced heel and toe, 3D molded footbed, carbon composite outsole

Choosing between the models will primarily come down to the intended use (MTB vs. Road), budget, whether you prefer BOA or strap closures, and materials preferences. For example, Giro’s Sector shoes feature cutting-edge materials and construction methods, but they’re also expensive.

How does the Giro Cylinder stack up against similar MTB shoe models from other manufacturers? 

Giro Cylinder vs. Other BOA-Based MTB Shoes 

Below are several popular bike shoe models competing in the same space as Giro’s Cylinder, including those that feature BOA/strap combinations, rubber lugged outsoles, and similar price points. Here’s how their high-level criteria compare:

Model	Weight	Closures	Notes
Giro Cylinder	315g (size 42)	1 BOA® L6, 1 Velcro toe strap	Synthetic upper, die-cut footbeds, nylon and rubber lugged co-molded outsole, toe and heel microfiber reinforcements
Specialized Recon 2.0	350g (size 42)	1 BOA® L6, 1 Velcro toe strap	Body Geometry sole and footbed, STRIDE toe-flex technology, rubber tread, stiffness index: 6 of 15
Bontrager XXX Mountain	331g (size 42)	2 BOA® IP1 dial	TPU upper material, OCLV carbon sole, stiffness index: 14 of 14, asymmetrical design for reduced top pressure, no-slip heel lining, GnardGuard outer material
Scott MTB Team	385g (size 42)	1 BOA® IP1 dial, 1 Velcro toe strap	Nylon/glass fiber composite outsole, synthetic microfiber upper, stiffness index: 8, Sticki Rubber sole, ErgoLogic removable insole
Fizik Terra X5	288g (size 42)	1 BOA® L6, 1 Velcro toe strap	Laser Perforated Microtex upper, Injected Carbon/TPU outsole
Shimano ME4	339g (size 42)	1 BOA® L6, 2 Velcro toe straps	Synthetic leather upper, glass fiber reinforced nylon midsole, rubber outsole, stiffness index: 5, adaptable cup insole

Taking a look at these details, we can see Fizik’s Terra X5 is meaningfully lighter than the competition, with Cylinder coming in second. Other than the fact that there’s a difference of 30g between the two, the X5 is perhaps the closest model above to the Cylinders. 

Comparatively, the Cylinder and Terra X5 feature more flexible soles than the Bontrager XXX, which delivers maximum stiffness (14/14). As such, if you enjoy frequent hike-a-biking, the XXX might not be your go-to choice. 

However, with a mid-range stiffness index of 6 and 8, respectively, the Terra X5 and Scott MTB Team shoes might work great if you find yourself frequently walking off the bike. 

Along these same lines, Shimano’s ME4 shoes feature the least stiff soles among competitors above and are also the only pair that offers a synthetic leather upper. The ME4 shoes also provide two straps, compared to the Cylinder’s one, if this appeals to you.

I briefly tested a pair of Specialized Recon 2.0s before making a final decision and found their toe was much more flexible than my Privateers. Since I frequently strike rocks during my rides, I decided to return them and explore other options, which eventually led me to the Cylinders.

Finally, Shimano’s ME4 shoes are the least stiff among competitors above. They are the only model with a synthetic leather upper and glass fiber reinforced nylon midsole if you prefer these characteristics. 

Let’s go ahead and wrap everything up in the next section. 

What’s the Bottom Line About Giro’s Cylinder Shoes? 

Based on their price-to-performance ratio, I think the Giro Cylinder MTB shoes represent a stellar value and can accommodate a broad cross-section of riding and terrain preferences.

Unless you prefer additional micro-adjustability from a second BOA dial or need to shed a few grams using higher-end materials or construction methods, Giro’s Cylinders might be challenging to beat.

Ready to buy? Consider clicking the link to the right. Why? As an Amazon Associate, TreadBikely earns from qualifying purchases, which helps support our mission. Learn more here.